What is the burden of proof?

What is the burden of proof?

Personal injury cases can involve various injuries due to hazards that caused an accident. For these cases, injured individuals may be faced with the task of fulfilling the burden of proof to allow them to acquire compensation for their winning lawsuit. This may be tough for some people if they are injured to the point where they are unable to go back to the scene and take pictures of the hazard. At this time, it can be best to hire legal counsel. An attorney can gather evidence from the scene to support the burden of proof and be used in the case. For these situations, it is best to take pictures of the scene. Try to get these pictures taken before the hazard is removed. This can help support your case. Personal injury cases can hold you responsible for proving the negligence of a property owner’s negligence and proving this negligence lead to your accident.

Property owners can be held responsible for maintaining a safe premises for those that will walk on it. They must take the proper steps to remove any hazards present and to keep their property clean for people to walk through. If they fail to do so, they may be held accountable for an accident that occurs. If a property owner knew or should have reasonably known about a hazard present and did not take the proper steps to remove it, they may be held responsible for an accident that occurred. This can cause them to pay damages to an injured party. As long as the injured party is able to fulfill the burden of proof, the property owner may be deemed responsible.

How can weather affect these cases?

During the winter time, snow and ice can lead to slippery conditions. This can become a hazard for pedestrians. These individuals can slip and fall on surfaces that are covered in these elements, causing painful injuries to individuals. When individuals are involved in these accidents, it can cause detrimental injuries. For weather-related hazards, property owners may have a specific time frame to remove snow and ice. If individuals proceed at their own risk before the time period has expired, they may not be able to hold the property owner responsible for their accident. However, if the snow is present after the time period has expired, the property owner may be proven to be negligent. They should have removed the hazard in time.

Decker, Tychostup & Friedman, LLC is comprised of experienced personal injury, criminal defense, and family law attorneys. Our firm is proud to serve clients in Baltimore, Maryland. If you require strong legal representation that will fight to protect your future, contact the attorneys at Decker, Tychostup & Friedman, LLC to schedule a consultation.